A Senior Engineer’s Guide to Meta's Interview Process and Questions
The Meta Hiring Process and Common Questions
Before you interview with Meta, read our guide on negotiating with them. They’ve gotten very aggressive, and if you don’t know the rules, you will fail.
Meta’s interview process and questions
Meta’s interview process consists of the following steps:
- Call with a Meta recruiter
- Technical phone screen (and possibly a second technical phone screen)
- Onsite interviews
Before we get into the details of each of these steps, here are a few general notes about Meta’s hiring process, evaluation criteria, and interviewers.
Meta interviewers are guided by the company’s current motto: move fast. All human groups have a metaphor they operate from. Meta isn’t a family or an army. They’re a well-structured Formula 1 team; they spend a lot of effort to put safeguards in place, and then they go pedal to the metal. At Meta, speed wins.
At Meta, because the process is centralized, you cannot interview with multiple teams concurrently like you can at some other tech companies. You get one shot on goal every ~3 to 6 months, depending on performance.
Anecdote from a Meta Interviewer
“If you pass Meta’s onsite, but don’t take the offer your status of ‘passed onsite’ is valid for a year. If you don’t take their offer and then choose to re-engage within that year, tell their recruiter ‘I already passed the onsite’ and push to get steps skipped because you usually can.”
Tip to get unstuck
When interviewing at Meta, listen closely to the subtle clues and hints your interviewer gives you. Meta is the only FAANG where you can’t become an interviewer unless you give good hints.
Step 1: Recruiter call
Please see the previous section called “A note about recruiter calls”. Also read our guide to negotiating with Meta. It starts at the recruiter call.
Step 2: Technical phone screen
Meta's technical phone screen is a 45-minute coding interview that focuses on data structures and algorithms.
At the beginning of the interview, your interviewer will ask you a question or two about your resume and recent work that you've done. This portion will take 5 minutes, and how you answer these questions doesn't meaningfully factor into the interview's outcome - they are just meant to break the ice and get you talking. The part that matters is the technical portion.
After the intro portion, your interviewer will ask you two coding questions, and they expect you to get through both in 35 minutes. These questions will be LeetCode easy or medium difficulty.
Meta’s technical phone screens are conducted in CoderPad. If you've never used it, you may want to play around in their sandbox and get familiar with their environment before your real interview. One specific thing about Meta's way of using CoderPad is that during the interview, they'll have code execution turned off - if you've used it before and are accustomed to testing your code during the interview by running it, you'll need to practice not being able to.
Step 3: Onsite interviews
The typical Meta onsite will consist of the following:
- At least two coding interviews
- Two system design OR product design interviews
- One behavioral interview
Types of Meta interviews and what to expect
There are four main types of interviews you’re going to encounter when you apply for an engineering job at Meta – coding interviews, behavioral interviews, and either a system design or product design interview. Here’s what to expect during each of these rounds of interviews.
Coding interview
Meta's process is highly standardized, so coding interview questions and themes tend to repeat. Coding questions are pre-approved, but that doesn’t mean the interviewers have no freedom.
Anecdote from a Meta Interviewer
“Meta gives you the questions to ask or modify. But they don't tell you the answers in their interviewing wiki. And they let you design the path of the question: you get to ask your own twists and turns.”
Anecdote from a Meta Interviewer
“There’s some variance with the interviewer, but usually there are 20 mins per question, and the questions are simple. They want you to get the algorithm fast, and implement the basic solution. The kind of bugs that can be acceptable are empty input, and out of scope inputs like empty array/null. But an incomplete algorithm at Meta usually doesn’t cut it. They want you to get to it and get to it quickly, and you can sacrifice making a little bit of a mess along the way.”
Anecdote from a Meta Interviewer
“I think there is a rule that during the programming interview, interviewers have to ask two questions. And the questions have to be balanced. The first is more like a juicy question testing problem solving skills and you as the interviewer can permit some bugs in the implementation. The second will be easy from the algorithmic point of view but the goal is to assess how much the candidate can write debugless code and test this code perfectly. And if a candidate fails to solve both problems, even if they somewhat shine during one problem: it will be ‘No Hire’.”
It's not that bugs are encouraged, it’s that they're the only company that's top-down directive is: sometimes, in certain rounds, bugs are okay. No other company does that. Meta relaxes the need for bug-free code so that candidates can code faster.
Finally, Meta doesn’t ask dynamic programming questions and, in fact, those questions are banned.
For everything you need to prepare for Meta’s coding interview, check out the section called "Meta coding interview preparation resources" below.
System design OR product design interview
Meta hires two types (on paper) of backend engineers: System Generalists and Product Generalists. System generalists get a system design interview, and product generalists get the confusingly named product design interview (in most other contexts, product design refers to UI/UX).
Which of these interviews you get is determined by your recruiter, based on your experience. If you have worked on a lot of product features, then you get a product design interview. If you have worked on high-scale distributed systems, then you get system design.
The product design interview at Meta is similar to the system design interview but with some key differences:
- System design focuses more on high level architecture and scale, while product design focuses more on interactions between services. For example, the expectations for API design in system design interviews is just high level arguments/data passed, whereas product design focuses more on the details, i.e., a more comprehensive list of arguments and response structure.
- Product design focuses more on how and what data flows through the entire system, between each service.
- Data models are weighted much higher in the product design interview than in system design. The expectation is to be more thorough and detailed.
Anecdote from a Meta Interviewer
“Product design is less databases, more data flow, more time spent on details of the API (e.g. parameters that will pass). System design is more databases, less API details, and more about scaling.”
Anecdote from a Meta Interviewer
“Many people think Meta only asks high level system design questions like ‘Design Twitter’ or ‘Design Meta Feed.’ But that’s not the case. They also ask low level questions. In E6 or above interviews, you will most likely be asked ‘Design Redis’, or ‘Design Kafka’, or ‘Design Memcached.’ I’d even seen rare occasions where E5 candidates would be asked low-level system design questions; low-level questions are less common in rounds for E5 and below.”
Anecdote from a Meta Interviewer
“You have to ask about back of the envelope estimations. A lot of senior engineers hate to do that. I hate to do that as well. It’s a waste of time. When I do the ‘There is a rule that I have to do this. But there is no point in doing this. Let’s spend 5 minutes talking about real system design. Let’s assume we have to scale our system from 0 to Google level and therefore estimations are just a waste of time.’”
Tip to get unstuck
Ask your interviewer: “Do you want to spend a few minutes on estimations? I’m okay with skipping it, but if you need to see it, then let’s do it. If we skipped it, one thing that might be a more interesting conversation would be spending a few minutes on how to scale this system.’”
Tip to get unstuck
If you don’t know what to talk about in a E5 Meta system design round, talk about user experience. Go on about two choices you could make, then explain in depth the one preferred because it’d be a better user experience.
It’s also common for Meta interviewers to ask you to walk them through a system you’ve worked on in the past, which is known as a reverse system design interview.
Behavioral interview
Unlike technical questions, behavioral questions at Meta are not standardized: interviewers can ask you whatever they want. Behavioral rounds are of medium/low importance at Meta; they’re less important than technical interview rounds, but they do carry some weight. For the best summary of what to expect in a Meta behavioral interview, read this blog post by a former Meta engineering manager – in it he describes exactly how behavioral interviews at Meta are evaluated and also includes a bunch of sample questions.
Here is a list of questions to get you started. Read the post to get examples of good answers (split out by the candidate’s seniority level!)
- “What project are you most proud of and why?”
- “Tell me about a recent day working that was really great and/or fun.”
- “Tell me about a time when you wanted to change something that was outside of your regular scope of work.”
- “Tell me about a time you had to make a fast decision and live with the results.”
- “Tell me about a time when you needed to overcome external obstacles to complete a task or project.”
- “Tell me about a time a project took longer as expected.”
- “Tell me about a person or team who you found most challenging to work with.”
- “Tell me about a time you disagreed with a coworker.”
- “Tell me about a situation where two teams couldn’t agree on a path forward.”
- “Describe a situation when you made a mistake, and what you learned from it.”
- “Tell me about some constructive feedback you received from a manager or a peer”
- “Tell me about a skill set that you observed in a peer or mentor that you want to develop in the next six months.”
Finally, if you are applying for E5 and above make sure to have a couple of projects that lasted longer than one quarter – if all your examples are of smaller initiatives, your interviewer may walk away with the impression that you can’t handle complex projects. Also, remember to quantify the impact that you made by sharing specific metrics.
How Meta makes hiring decisions
Meta’s candidate review and feedback process is usually completely asynchronous. Sometimes, they’ll do a live debrief but it’s rare. This means there’s a low likelihood for an interviewer to “fight” for a candidate. Socially influencing interviewers won’t go very far here.
Meta is also the only FAANG that asks interviewers for a confidence score when filling out post-onsite feedback forms. As a result, the process at Meta can be more forgiving on failed rounds because a lower confidence score means a failed round carries less weight. Also, Meta is the only FAANG that directly asks interviewers about downleveling.
Anecdote from a Meta Interviewer
“Coding is used to decide ‘Should we hire this person?’ System and product design is used to decide ‘How should we level this person?’
For coding interviews, the interviewer says a binary score first: ‘Hire’ or ‘No Hire’. Then in the comments, they say how confident they are in that binary score. The ‘Hire’ or ‘No Hire’ is an official metric, but the confidence score is not.
For system/product design, the interviewer gives the ‘Hire’ or ‘No Hire’ first. Then they say if the candidate should be considered for another level.
So the final decision could be like: ‘No Hire’ for E5 with low confidence. ‘Hire’ for E4 with high confidence."
In cases where the hiring panel is hung, it’s possible they may request one more follow-up interview to help them get more signal.
Anecdote from a Meta Interviewer
“Interview feedback is discussed primarily by the system design and behavioral interviewers, and those are the interviewers who have the most say regarding both the hire decision and a candidate’s level. If interviewers don’t feel like they got enough signal and the candidate ends up being on the fence, the recruiter will push for an additional round. Indicative hint: If you have an additional follow-up interview, your interviewers were probably split."
Anecdote from a Meta Interviewer
“At Staff level and above, it’s a mandate that candidates can’t get hired if they don’t pass both system design rounds.”
Anecdote from a Meta Interviewer
“For E6 and above candidates, if you fail one system design round but do well in the other rounds, you can get a mulligan. They can let you retake one system design round. But the same isn’t true for behavioral: if you fail there’s no mulligan. If you fail the behavioral round, it will be ‘No Hire.’”
'Team matching, offers, and “Bootcamp”'
Meta made some changes to their process in 2023. Before, unlike at other FAANGs, you'd generally accept an offer before knowing with which team you'd end up on. Then you'd do a 6 week “Bootcamp”, where you'd be trained on Meta's engineering infrastructure and systems. After the bootcamp, there would be a 2 week team-matching period.
Now, after you finish the onsite, you jump straight to the team matching process. Team matching now happens BEFORE you get an offer, and offers are contingent on team matching completely successfully.
You'll talk with hiring managers from a number of teams to gauge fit and chemistry: we've heard that sometimes it's a handful, and sometimes it's over 10.
After your team matching conversations, your recruiter will ask you to choose a team. In order to move forward, both you and the hiring manager have to opt in.
Once you make your choice, your recruiter will officially make an offer, and you'll usually have just a few days to make your decision. We hope this will change in the future, but recently Meta has been very aggressive with both offer timelines and with negotiations - they will not negotiate unless you can share competitive offer details from another top-tier company.
One other key difference between Meta's new process and the old one is what happens during Bootcamp. Historically, Bootcamp took 6 weeks, and in addition to training new hires on Meta's engineering infrastructure and systems, there'd be a multi-week “speed dating”-esque team matching component.
Bootcamp still exists, but now it's much shorter - 2-4 weeks, and the focus is getting new engineers ramped up on generic tools. After that, new engineers will continue to ramp up on their specific teams.
The team matching process is a bit like speed dating. You meet with hiring managers to gauge fit and chemistry. In order to move forward, both of you have to opt in.
Anecdote from a Meta Interviewer
“When the market is good, you can talk to 20 different teams at the same time.”
There are exceptions – some people with niche skills may get hired for a specific team before they start Bootcamp, but they still have to do the bootcamp period, just not the team-matching part afterwards.
Meta coding interview preparation resources
“Top Meta Questions" on LeetCode is a solid question bank for your practice – you’ll want to practice modifying these a bit because you’ll get slightly modified versions of these questions in real life.
In addition, we’ve aggregated a bunch of useful Meta content for you! We have replays of candidates doing mock interviews with Meta interviewers, long-form solutions to common Meta questions, and deep dives into technical topics that tend to come up in Meta interviews.
Meta interview replays
Below are a series of mock interview replays, conducted by Meta interviewers on our platform. Watch them so you can learn from others’ mistakes.
Solutions to common Meta questions
Below are common questions that interviewers from Meta ask on our platform. Since our data comes from mock interviews, questions may not be exactly the same as what you'd see in real interviews.
Technical topics
To figure out what technical topics might come up in your Meta interviews, we did a few things. First, we spoke to a bunch of Meta interviewers in our community. Then we cross-referenced all the anecdotes we heard with Glassdoor data, the LeetCode question list above, AND our own data-set of mock interviews in the style of Meta. Based on all of the above, here are the technical topics you’re likely to encounter.
Other Meta interview preparation resources
The following interview guides and resources can help you better understand Meta’s recruitment process and support your interview prep so you impress the hiring committee.
System design
- A Senior Engineer's Guide to the System Design Interview
- If you’re primarily going for E5, then mainly practice high-level system design questions. If E6, then focus on low-level questions.
- Reverse system design interviews happen sometimes at Meta, so you might like to practice these too.
Behavioral
- This blog post about behavioral interviewing at Meta, written by a former Meta engineering manager.
- Even though it’s not Meta-specific, A Senior Engineer's Guide to the Amazon Leadership Principles Interview will help.
- Practice your ability to demonstrate communication skills with stakeholders AND practice talking about times where there was a conflict and you were able to resolve it.
Credits
Creator and author
Editor
Special thanks
We know exactly what to do and say to get the company, title, and salary you want.
Interview prep and job hunting are chaos and pain. We can help. Really.
